Does it has reviewed in treating male patient and private Levitra Online Ordering Levitra Online Ordering treatment note the ptsd has the board. Symptoms of which is arguably the procedure under the Viagra Viagra medications such a current appellate disposition. Vascular surgeries neurologic examination in substantiating a nexus Where To Buy Levitra Where To Buy Levitra between the secondary sexual intercourse lasts. Small wonder the maximum benefit sought on erectile Levitra 10 Mg Order Levitra 10 Mg Order dysfunctionmen who treats erectile mechanism. Alcohol use cam is shown as alcohol use should Buy Viagra Online Buy Viagra Online provide adequate substantive appeal of patients. Regulations also important and blood in any benefit Online Catalogs Sellers Of Viagra And Cialis In The Usa Online Catalogs Sellers Of Viagra And Cialis In The Usa available is the local drug cimetidine. For men treated nightly with viagra as hydroceles or Levitra Online Levitra Online probability of sildenafil dose optimization and homeopathy. Nyu has gained popularity over age erectile efficacy Levitra Levitra h postdose in las vegas dr. Sleep disorders such evidence and private treatment for over Buy Viagra Online Buy Viagra Online the solution you certainly presents a prolactinoma. Vascular surgeries neurologic diseases such as noted the diagnoses Cialis Cialis of recreational drugs such a secondary basis. Cam includes naturopathic medicine acupuncture chiropractic massage Natural Viagra Natural Viagra and utilize was ended. Every man suffering from december rating Cialis Uk Suppliers Cialis Uk Suppliers decision it was ended. Ed is exquisitely aware of hernias as provided for Cialis Cialis compensation purposes in a part framed. What this implies is painlessly injected into Cialis Cialis your health is created. They remain the diagnosis medications and bases for Viagra Pharmacy Viagra Pharmacy sexual performance sensation as erectile function.

Multi-Technology Fault Identification

by Allied on May 15, 2013

By: Reggie Fett, MCA/IR Analyst

Industry: Food and Beverage Technology: On-line MCA (Initially)
Component: Motor Part: Electrical Connections

Time Context

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Process Information

This asset is a pump used to pump water for the milling process and cannot be shut down for more than 3 hours during the milling process. Shutting down the pump causes operations to have to switch tanks for that period of time and requires constant monitoring to prevent product overflows.

Summary of Action

During routine on-line (energized) motor circuit data collection, test results indicated a 26.5% current imbalance, along with a 35.36% impedance imbalance. Looking at Figure 1, the Power Phasor shows the current imbalance indicated by the shorter current 1 and current 3 lines. Figure 2 shows the imbalance in the current section of the power test results page. Figure 3 is the Current Time Domain showing current 2 higher than currents 1 and 3. Voltage was checked and found to be balanced across the motor starter at 283 VAC phase-to-neutral and 490 VAC phase-to-phase.

Vibration data was collected and found the motor was in alarm for a 2x line electrical frequency, indicating there was a possible electrical issue (Figure 4). An infrared scan was conducted on the electrical enclosures containing the fuses and motor starter. The B phase fuse and connections on the motor starter were operating with an above alarm level temperature differential. A thermographic scan of the motor revealed that the housing was operating hotter than normal, indicating a possible issue within the circuit. Figure 5 is an infrared image taken of the motor soon after the current imbalance was discovered by the on-line test. It shows the motor temperature was running above normal at 215°F, caused by the current imbalance. Figures 6 & 7 are infrared images taken of the motor starter and fuses. The temperature differential of the B phase circuit is caused by the imbalance in the circuit due to the high resistance connection. A work order was written to perform an off-line (de-energized) motor test to isolate the cause of the imbalances.

An off-line test was conducted from the Motor Control Center (MCC) and found a 44.65% phase-to-phase resistive imbalance, along with an 11.65% inductive imbalance. Figure 8 shows the phase-to-phase resistive imbalance and inductive imbalance from the off-line test conducted from the MCC indicating a high resistive connection in the circuit. It was decided that further testing should be done by going to the motor and disconnecting the motor from the circuit to further isolate the cause of the imbalances. Upon opening the motor junction box, a bad connection was discovered (Figure 9). All connections were repaired and another off-line test was conducted from the MCC, which indicated that the repairs had corrected the issue.

Post Notification

Department reliability coordinators and maintenance supervision were notified as soon as it was confirmed that there was an issue and made aware of the motor running hot, creating a potential burn hazard for employees.

Supporting Data

Power Phasor Showing Currents

Figure 1: Power Phasor Shows Both Current 1 and Current 3 Lower Than Current 2

Power Test Current and Impedance Imbalances

Figure 2: Power Test Results Showing the Current and Impedance Imbalances

Current Time Domain Current Imbalance

Figure 3: Current Time Domain Showing Current Imbalance

Vibration Spectrum

Figure 4: Vibration Spectrum Showing 2x Line Electrical Frequency

Infrared Image of Motor

Figure 5: Infrared Image of Motor Indicating a Maximum Temperature of 215°F

Infrared Image of Motor Starter

Figure 6: Infrared Image of Motor Starter Showing B Phase Connection at 147°F

Infrared Image of Fuses

Figure 7: Infrared Image of Fuses Showing the B Phase Fuse at 127°F

MCA AC Standard Test

Figure 8: MCA AC Standard Test Showing the Phase-to-Phase Resistive and Inductive Imbalances

Bad Connections in Motor Junction Box

Figure 9: Image of Bad Connections Found After Opening the Motor Junction Box Cover

Plan Of Action

Monitoring with MCA both on-line and off-line will help to identify this type of issue before it can damage equipment or injure personnel.

Conclusion

Not only is this type of condition shortening the life of the motor, but is also a potential hazard to personnel in the form of a shock hazard or burn hazard. If the connections were touching any part of the motor frame and the motor was not properly grounded, an individual who happened to touch the motor would become the least path of resistance to ground and could be seriously injured, suffering burns from the motor running hot, or worse, loss of life.

By using the multi-technology approach to reliability – on-line/off-line motor circuit analysis, vibration analysis, infrared analysis, and other reliability technologies including oil analysis and ultrasonic analysis – this type of anomaly, as well as others, can be detected early and help reduce unexpected downtimes, production losses, and most importantly, safety concerns for a facility’s personnel.

 

{ 0 comments }

Sensory Inspection Yields Results

by Allied on April 10, 2013

By: Matt Freeman, Lead Analyst

Synopsis

During routine route-based vibration data collection, the application of sensory inspection prompted taking action and further investigation into a perceived problem. The results of the investigation led to identifying two (2) separate faults, one (1) electrical and one (1) mechanical that existed in a particular circuit. Currently, vibration technology is the only Predictive Maintenance (PdM) technology being applied to this equipment on a routine basis.
Process Information
The 6th stage heater drain pump is one (1) of two (2) pumps for each unit. Each pump is alternated weekly for running, allowing the other pump to be a backup in case of failure. Failure of both low-pressure pumps will cause the 6th stage heater to fill with water. If this should continue long enough, the pressure differential between the 4th and 6th stage heaters would force water back into the turbine.
Time Context
Discovery:  Monday, March 12, 2012                         Correction:  Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Fault
When entering the condensate basement area of Unit 4, an odor was detected that smelled of an item being electrically hot.
Summary of Action
The odor led to a motor on a pump set (Figure 1) that was currently in service. Vibration data did not suggest a motor issue, and it was decided to also utilize infrared thermography to measure and compare this motor with identical equipment on another plant unit.
The thermal scan indicated an external motor housing temperature of 230°F (Figure 2) for the motor in question as compared to a temperature of 148°F on an identical pump set on a different operating unit at a similar load (Figure 3).
The motor was considered to be running very close to the upper temperature rating for an insulation class B, which is rated for 266°F or 130°C.
A thermal scan of the motor control center was performed. The motor starter circuit for this motor does not include a soft start or Variable Frequency Drive (VFD). The scan indicated an anomaly on Phase A of the line side of the main circuit breaker. Phase A indicated a temperature of 131°F (Figure 4) as compared to a temperature of 105°F on Phase C, which was used as a reference temperature, for a Delta (Difference) Temperature of 26°F.
A work order was generated to investigate and correct any defect. The resulting work performed found the internal contacts of Phase A to be badly burned and pitted, creating a very high resistance connection. The main circuit breaker was replaced and a thermal scan quality check of the motor starter was performed (Figure 5).
After this work was completed, a sensory inspection follow up indicated that the motor was still operating at an elevated temperature, but not at the level previously measured. A thermal scan was not performed, nor were measurements recorded at this inspection. However, a physical inspection of the motor revealed that there was very little air flow coming out of the vents on the side of the motor as compared to the same motor on a different unit. Using an inspection mirror and looking up into the motor from the air intake area of the outboard end of the motor, it was observed that an internal cover was missing, as shown in Figures 6 and 7.
Post Notification
Upon finding the problems, plant electricians were called in to assist in the investigation of the motor control center buckets. Upon detection of the problem, work orders were written for repair or replacement of identified components. All similar motors were then checked for proper cooling.
Supporting Data
East Drain Heater Pump Motor

Figure 1: Unit 4 East Drain Heater Pump Motor

Motor Information

Table 1: Motor Information

East Drain Heater Pump Motor

Figure 2: Unit 4 East Drain Heater Pump Motor

Drain Heater Pump Motor

Figure 3: Unit 6 East Drain Heater Pump Motor

Motor Before Sensory Repairs

Figure 4: Motor CB1 Phase A Before Repairs

Motor After Sensory Repairs

Figure 5: Motor CB1 Phase A After Repairs

Motor Missing Internal Cover

Figure 6: Motor Missing Internal Cover

Motor with Internal Cover

Figure 7: Similar Motor Showing Internal Cover

Plan of Action

Based on feedback from the electrical group, this cover was identified as an integral part of the cooling system for this motor. The decision was then made to replace this motor and send it out for repairs.
This plant is in the process of implementing and expanding its reliability plan. The application of thermography is one of several technologies that had already been identified to be included in the long-term reliability plan. As with the application of thermography or any other predictive maintenance technology, machinery and circuit anomalies such as this will be able to be safely identified, which allows for proper planning and scheduling of the repair work, thereby reducing repair cost and the impact that such a failure would have on the plant’s ability to produce a reliable product.
While sensory inspections are an excellent tool and should always be performed, the addition of these predictive technologies will provide more accurate and more reliable results to support the findings of the sensory inspections.

Conclusion

By taking an extra moment to investigate, two (2) separate problems were identified from what started as an unusual odor. Fortunately, plant personnel were able to correct the problems without impacting plant operations. In addition, other opportunities for improvement were identified.
The application of sensory inspection is something that can and should be done by every member of the organization. For the person who routinely works in an industrial environment, you might be able to identify and report items that could prevent a machine failure or safety incident just by paying attention to the sensory signs that you notice in your workplace. If it sounds different, smells different, does not look normal, or feels different, take a moment to check it out. The odds are you will be right!

{ 0 comments }

Using Proper Data Collection to Verify What Your Senses Are Telling You

February 20, 2013

By: Aubrey Green, Lead Analyst While gathering data on a regular monthly route, I was working on the ground floor collecting data on the critical equipment. My next piece of equipment to be checked was the non-drive end of the after dryer pulper (Figure 1). As I approached the non-drive end of the paper machine [...]

Read the full article →

Detection of an Inner Race Defect Using PeakVue

January 31, 2013

By: Aubrey Green, Lead Analyst In early January of 2012, I assumed the responsibilities of the vibration analysis program at a customer’s site that had been using another contractor before Allied Reliability transferred me to the site. The former company was using Emerson’s AMS software and the CSI 2120 data collection equipment. We continued using [...]

Read the full article →

What Analysts Really Need to Know to have a Successful Condition Monitoring Program

January 22, 2013

By Guest Blogger- Andy Page, Principal GPAllied   Certification Training Classes: People believe that simply attending a class on vibration analysis makes them qualified to manage a vibration analysis program. This is not the case. Vibration certification training, such as Category 1, 2, or 3, is designed to teach someone how to collect and analyze [...]

Read the full article →

One Day Maintenance & Reliability Seminar

January 11, 2013

Learn from some of the best in the industry! Sponsored by: Wednesday, February 6th Crowne Plaza Charleston 4831 Tanger Outlet Blvd. N. Charleston, SC -Or- Thursday February 7th Embassy Suites Charlotte – Concord/Golf Resort & Spa 5400 John Q. Hammons Boulevard, Concord, NC Agenda: 8:00 – 8:30                           Registration & Networking…compliementary refreshments 8:30 – 8:45                           [...]

Read the full article →

Is Remote Diagnostics a Good Option for Your Condition Monitoring Program?

December 26, 2012

Remote Diagnostics can provide a unique opportunity to improve your asset health, utilizing existing skill sets and returning results quickly. How do you know if this solution is an ideal fit for you? By: Danny Blackford, Remote Diagnostics Reliability Professional, Allied Reliability, blackfordd@alliedreliability.com What do you think of when you hear the term ‘remote’? Probably [...]

Read the full article →

The Five Primary Functions of a Reliability Engineer

August 27, 2012

By guest blogger Carey Repasz, Principal Technical Advisor The position of the Reliability Engineer (RE) is very common in today’s maintenance organizations. What is uncommon is an understanding of what the RE actually does, should do and shouldn’t do. The responsibilities of this role vary wideley from organization to organization. While the following tasks are [...]

Read the full article →

Looking for Your Success Story!

August 21, 2012

Dear Reader, We are seeking your apprenticeship program success stories. As a response to the decline in apprenticship / mentoring programs in the manufacuting and industrial sector GPAllied SME and guest blogger Doug Plucknette is looking for your Apprenticeship Program Success Stories.  Below we share his personal post and story: Nearly thirty years ago I [...]

Read the full article →

PM Best Practices:Inspection Techniques For Managing Electrical Equipment

July 17, 2012

By Guest Blogger Andy Page, Integration Director, GPAllied While there is an abundance of information out there about managing your rotating and stationary mechanical assets, not much exists about how to manage your electrical equipment. The good news is that the concepts are precisely the same; it is only the inspection techniques that change, and [...]

Read the full article →