Storage Silo Smoldering Case Study

by Allied on April 23, 2012

Storage Tank – Thermal Image Chronograph

NOTE: Each image is adjusted to provide the best contrast for visual representation of issues being observed. Temperature scales will vary for this reason.

Synopsis

This case study provides a chronological review of the issues found within a customer’s storage tank. The first signs of possible issues within the storage tank were found in thermal images of the north side of the tank (Figure 1). The bean line can be seen just above the warm spot.

Thermal images of north side of tank. Both images show the same spot from different angles.

Time Context

Discovery: Wednesday, July 6, 2011
Correction: Saturday, July 30, 2011

Summary of Action

The images in Figure 1 prompted the need for additional imaging within the tank. Images taken from removed air vents on the north side were the first images captured within the storage tank and indicated temperatures in excess of 300°F in the roof support system (Figure 2).

Thermal images of storage tank interior.

Two spots indicating a thermal anomaly were identified on the beans, but later could not be located (Figure 3).

Thermal anomaly in beans.

It was believed that debris had fallen from the roof support and self-extinguished upon contact with the beans.
Images taken on July 7, 2011 from the man access hatch confirmed many of the prior areas seen on July 7, 2000. Several new areas were found, indicating that the issue had spread throughout the tank roof support system (Figure 4).

Areas of concern in storage tank.

Temperatures identified were in excess of 500°F.
In addition, a new thermal anomaly was found on the southwest portion of the roof (Figure 5).

Thermal anomaly in southwest portion of roof.

It was determined that this was above one of the roof supports identified from internal scans. Future scans failed to re-identify this anomaly, indicating that it had moved away from the roof.

Thermal image of beans in storage tank.

Figure 6 is the first image that showed an issue had developed within the beans. The area of increased temperature is clearly seen to be sitting on or near the surface of the beans. Later images showed the progression of this area down into the beans.
Taken one day after discovery, Figure 7 showed that the temperature had increased from 91°F to 173°F.

Changes in thermal anomaly one day after discovery.

Additionally, the area was sitting lower within the beans. As shown in Figure 8, the growth of the increased thermal activity indicated that a much larger area within the tank was involved. This only represented the area directly in contact with the wall of the tank. At this point, nothing was known as to the extent of any issues beyond this area.

Growth of increased thermal activity.

On July 15, the temperature readings on the exterior of the tank were maintaining themselves in the 130°F range (Figure 9).

Temperature readings of exterior of storage tank.

The total area had increased, but appeared to have ceased the initial rapid growth seen in the first few days.
Over the next several days, the tank was filled with nitrogen in an attempt to extinguish any issues within the tank. The large spot on the northeast side of the tank continued to present itself with varying temperatures and sizes, but nothing larger or higher than had been previously seen. The original small spot on the north side also continued to present itself, but there was no increase in temperature or size. For this reason, it was uncertain if this was related to issues within the tank or due to the tank itself.

Internal thermal video screen capture of beans and storage tank.

Figure 10 is a screen capture from an internal thermal video provided by the Gainesville Fire Department that shows a long trail of actively smoldering beans. The upper left portion of this still image is the area just inside the large hot area seen on the tank exterior. The estimated length was over 60 feet.

Storage tank with 500+ gallons of water added.

The screen capture in Figure 11 shows the area adjacent to the tank wall after showering over 500 gallons of water onto the area. While this image appears to indicate a positive result, images taken of the exterior indicated otherwise:
1. Figure 12 was taken at 7:30AM, prior to any water being induced into the tank. The maximum temperature at this time was 154.9°F.

Storage tank before adding water, 7:30AM.

2. Figure 13 was taken at 10:40AM, prior to any water being induced into the tank. The maximum temperature at this time was 176.1°F. This was a normal increase due to solar gain throughout the day.

Storage tank before adding water, 10:40AM.

3. Taken at 11:01AM, 20 minutes into applying water, Figure 14 shows that the exterior temperature had increased almost 30 degrees. Additionally, the area displaying intense heat had greatly increased. The dark blue area to the upper left of the spot shows the water contacting the inside of the tank.

Storage tank after adding water, 11:01AM.

4. By 11:13AM, over 500 gallons of water had been applied onto the beans. The external temperature had increased to 202.9°F (Figure 15). The dark blue area shows where water was applied and indicates that it was not penetrating the beans as expected.
It was decided to end applying water due to the lack of positive results.

Storage tank after adding water, 11:13AM.

One day after applying water, the temperature settled in the mid 120°F range (Figure 16). The larger light blue area was believed to be water surrounding the area and absorbing temperature from the hot beans.

Thermal image taken one day after adding water to the storage tank.

As originally seen, the small spot on the north side of the tank was still present (Figure 17). At this time, it was believed to be an indication of the tail end of the smoldering ribbon seen in the firefighters’ video.

Thermal anomaly on north side of tank after adding water.

Plan of Action

Upon reviewing the application of water to the beans and the tank, it was decided to access and remove the beans from the side of the tank. This task involved cutting a minimum of two holes into the side of Tank 100. The first hole was to be directly over the observed hot spot with the second hole at a point that would allow sufficient draining of the beans. The ability to use infrared imaging ensured accurate placement of both holes and the success of this process.
Figure 18 was taken prior to any holes being cut into the tank. This image shows the extent to which the water had saturated into the beans, as well as the level of the beans. Figure 19 shows issues directly beneath the first hole cut into the tank, while Figure 20 shows greater issues than previously indicated.

Thermal activity prior to cutting holes in tank wall.

Screen shot from the firefighters’ video, taken below first hole.

Based on the information from the first hole, the second hole was determined to be necessary. This hole was to be cut 10 feet to the right of and 10 feet down from the hot spot on the northeast side of the tank. The hole was to be 24 inches in diameter.
Figures 21-30 are a few selected still images and video screen captures taken throughout the day.

Working on storage tank.

22 through 27 were taken during the bean extraction process.

This screen capture shows one of the final areas inside the tank.

This screen capture shows the same area from Figure 28 as it was being dragged out of the tank. Future imaging failed to find this area.

This screen capture shows the area inside the tank where the hot spot existed. The arrow shows a faint remnant of the previous issue. This small area was removed from the tank.

Supporting Data

A total of 201 still images and 86 videos were recorded. A portion of the images and videos were provided by the Gainesville Fire Department.
All on-site images were captured with a FLIR P660 (s/n 404000174), calibration date December 22, 2010.

Resolution

Thermal imaging was conducted of the internal area of the tank two days after all issues had been removed from Storage Tank 100.
No issues were identified in either the roof supports or the beans.

{ 0 comments }

Allied Reliability is pleased to announce that we have been named a recipient of the Thomas M. Drury Award for Achieving a perfect incident record in a high-exposure industry for the second year in a row.  Each year, the Thomas M. Drury award for Contractor Safety is presented at the South Central Joint Mine Safety and Health Conference (MSHA) to contractors that have shown exceptional safety leadership and performance while working within operations.

Allied Team Members from left to right: Cary Weaver- IR Analyst, Chris Ozanich- IR Analyst, Christopher Rohde- Program Manager, Steve Toomey- SME, Leonard Bonderenko- Vibration Analyst

Reliably Safe

As a company that sends Full Time Equivalent, part time and mentor consultants to client sites around the country it is imperative that our employees conduct their duties in the safest way possible not only to uphold the stringent safety expectations of Allied Reliability but so as to never put one of our clients in danger or compromise the safety policies of our clients.  This two- fold level of expectations could be a difficult promise to live up to. But as an company that holds our performance to the highest standards possible we expect our team to go beyond compliance to exceed safety regulations and become an example for all of their on the job colleagues as well as an on-site resource for best safety practices.

Keeping up
In order to make sure Allied Reliability Team members can act as safety benchmarks within their environment we make a point to consistently provide them with important safety tips and reminders.  As a company we share weekly ‘Safety Tool Box Talks’ with our team in the field for them to share with their team.  Each week our field technicians and analysts review a useful single point lesson that can be shared and discussed in a 5-10 minute time frame.  Each tip is centered around safety, whether it be a Tool Box Talk on ladder safety or lacerations, each week we share something new for our team to reflect on.  This type of continuous improvement and learning is what sets Allied Reliability apart from our competition and why we provide Inspired Reliability.

{ 0 comments }

Reliability Centered Lubrication – A Success Story

March 1, 2012

By Stacy Heston, CLS, PMP, CMRP, OMA, Lubrication Subject Matter Expert, Allied Reliability Inc. Lubrication practices are often overlooked as a potential time and money saver for a plant.  However Cargill Charlotte has found that by optimizing their lubrication task intervals, utilizing specific grease volumes, and implementing an oil analysis program, the overall reliability of [...]

Read the full article →

Oil Analysis Integrated with Other Condition Monitoring Strategies

February 14, 2012

By Angie Meinsma, Oil Analysis & Lubrication Technician, Allied Reliability It is often said that oil is the “lifeblood” of machines and equipment. Taking oil samples from rotating equipment for condition monitoring is like taking blood samples from a human. Analysts look for abnormalities within the fluid. The goal is to find faults, treat the [...]

Read the full article →

MCA Online Demodulation Spectrum of a Belt Driven Application

January 19, 2012

By: Reggie Fett, Motor Circuit Analyst Industry: Corn Milling        Fault Zone: Mechanical Motor: Toshiba                     Voltage: 460 Horsepower: 150                Speed: 1785 Synopsis The coupling between a motor and its load is prone to problems due to wear and the application. For example, consider the following: • Belt or direct drive misalignment • Belt or insert wear • Belt [...]

Read the full article →

Online Motor Circuit Analysis Testing for Mechanical Defects

December 22, 2011

By: T.J. Garten, IR/MCA Specialist Bean Conditioner – Horizontal Rotary Vessel Motor:        TECO-Westinghouse          75 HP                     1775 RPM Gearbox:     Falk 2120Y3-1                    Ratio: 70.09 Pinion:       19 tooth Synopsis The Bean Conditioner is a rotary vessel used to condition soy beans prior to transportation to flaking equipment. This particular vessel rotates on a slight uphill axis and is [...]

Read the full article →

Analysis of Tank Deposits Using Infrared Technologies

December 13, 2011

By: Aubrey Green, Lead Analyst, Allied Reliability Case Study Information: While working as a Predictive Maintenance Technician in a paper mill, an analyst received a telephone call from the Pulping area. Their samples of white liquor were showing particles (turbidity). These particles were affecting the quality of pulp that was being produced. When these sand-like [...]

Read the full article →

Radio Frequency Interference on Commtest VBx Series Data Collectors From Improperly Grounded Equipment

October 25, 2011

Don’t Let the title fool you, this is a great and very short case study!  Allied Reliability SME Aubrey Green examines a dilemma at a salt evaporation plant in upper NY.  Read it for yourself here: Radio Frequency Interference on Commtest VBx Series Data Collectors from Improperly Grounded Equipment

Read the full article →

Case Study: Power Circuit- MCA Detects Where Vibration Analysis Could Not

September 19, 2011

Allied Reliability Analyst Tim Greismer offers this case study on the motor of a Coal Pulverizer which was failing and creating operational problems for the coal plant.  Vibration analysis failed to isolate the problem, Tim and his team use Motor Circut Analysis to identify the root cause of the issue.  In this study he walks [...]

Read the full article →

The Increasing Pace of Change

September 7, 2011

As published in SMRP Solutions Magazine August 2011, GPAllied SME Darrin Wikoff addresses the Increasing Pace of Change in today’s dynamic business climate.  Read it for yourself here: The Increasing Pace of Change

Read the full article →